Thursday, October 23, 2014

Africa Isn't Coming Close to Their Goals


Genetically modified foods are produced from organisms that have had specific changes to its DNA using the methods of genetic engineering. It has been noted that in richer and more economically stable countries—citizens do not favor GMOs—mainly because they are not needed. In more developed countries, citizens are fine with there imported produce and farming techniques that are used. Personally, I believe that many people in developed countries are moving towards more organic and local farmers for food sources. With additional leeway, the public is more favorable to foods without fortifiers, additives, or pesticide usage.
However in some instances, countries do not have an option on whether to decide from non-organic, or organic produce, or how their food is manufactured. In Africa currently human poverty and hunger are both increasing. With nearly one-third of men, women, and children in Sub Saharan Africa currently under nourished, they have the largest proportion of hungry people. Over the past 15 years, Africans have been living on less than one dollar a day, and the number of people is consistently growing. With a negative GDP per capita, their economic prosperity seems farfetched. Developed by the United Nations, countries collaborated on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).  Some of the goals included are: Eradicate Extreme Poverty and Hunger (targeting halve of the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day), Reduce Child Mortality (reducing it by two-thirds of children under 5), Ensure Environmental Sustainability (integrating the principles of sustainable development to countries and reverse the loss of environmental resources), and Develop a Global Partnership for Development (focusing on rule based, predictable, non discriminatory trading and financial system). These are just four out of the eight MDGs. With these goals a lot of them are associated with Africa and specifically Sub Sahara. It has been noted that if Africa continues at this negative rate, they will not meet their goals by the 2015 deadline.
Countries that were similar to Africa’s poverty included China and India. Nevertheless, China and India were able to make investments in agricultural science, which was essential. Their agricultural research and development stimulated over all agricultural GDP growth and reduced the amount of poverty. Many would think that Africa would follow other nations leads and work together to develop a more productive agriculture system—but due to African leaders, they do not want to make the investment in science.
I am strongly against GMOs and see why African leaders may not personally want to use them. However, I highly doubt that starving farmers are going to pass up an offer to develop food. In this case I think that some the leadership within African Governments may have to do with some corruption. I do not want to say that African leaders are keeping their people poor…but I also think that they are being quite selfish in a way to stop what could be monumental development for their country. 

6 comments:

  1. This is a very thought-provoking post. Do you think that some of the food distribution issues that Africa is facing are due to the impact of colonialism? I've heard statistics that the United States produces enough crops to feed the entire world, but it is simply a distribution issue. Do you think that developed nations such as the United States are responsible for helping or feeding nations that have a lot of hunger?
    -Nikki

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I slightly think that the decolonization of Africa is to blame for food distribution, not particularly colonialism. I'm saying this because with colonization countries were very much well ordered, maintained, and administered with less corruption. But when the decolonization of Africa started countries began to move more towards authoritarian rulers, and corruption, human rights/ famines began to increase.

      Believing in Jeffery Sachs, the United States definitely has the capacity to feed enough hungry people. The United States government spends so little on foreign aid (roughly around 1%), that the amount should be significantly increased. In times of need, I think that the United States should be responsible for developing programs that will work to eliminate hunger.

      Delete
  2. You say that you are against GMOs here but do you see them as a part of the problem? Do you think they can be a part of any short-term solution?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the states within Africa have a lot of other issues that are causing hunger. For example, limited access to health care, poor infrastructure, lack of employment opportunities, and lack of quality land. Not using GMOs isn't the only reason.

      If African leaders were willing to use GMOs, they could easily solve hunger within the short term. It would be up to the farmers, government, and producers if they wanted to keep using them in the long run.

      Delete
  3. Do you think that African countries need international assistance to reach the milestones set out in the Millennium Development Goals? Why do you think African leaders are against GMO's?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. International assistance is a must. I could only think that African leaders would have the same reasons as to why many Americans are against GMOs: public health effect, unnatural, impact on biological diversity, "franken food", and corporate control (which I think could be a big reason).

      Delete